Live remote-job market data alongside independent Remote-Friendliness Scores for the companies we have researched.
Job data refreshed hourly RFS research updated September 1, 2026
Active Remote Jobs
52,650
Across the full live YayRemote feed
Employers Hiring
10,432
Represented by at least one active role
RFS-Scored Companies
25
19 currently have active roles
Average RFS
58.3/100
Across 25 assessed companies
Live market data
Active roles and hiring-employer totals refresh every hour.
RFS company research
Scores update as research passes our evidence and publication gates.
Monthly snapshots
Historical comparisons use dated snapshots, latest August 2026.
Remote Friendly Company Directory
Browse every company with a published RFS assessment. Search and filter the research independently of whether a company is hiring today.
Showing 25 of 25 researched companies
Buffer
Technology · Fully Remote
53RFS / 100
Buffer scores 53/100, indicating a moderately supported remote-work profile with several strong verified practices and some important areas that remain partial or unverified. The score reflects the strength and completeness of the available public evidence, not a guarantee of every employee’s experience.
Red Hat’s score of 70 indicates a strong remote-work profile based on the available public evidence. Several core practices are verified, while some areas remain partial or unverified; these unknowns should be treated as gaps in public confirmation, not negative findings. Confidence is high, with 60% overall assessment coverage.
Shopify scores 83 out of 100, indicating strong publicly supported remote-work signals overall. The profile is based on medium-confidence evidence covering 75% of company signals and 60% of assessments. It should not be read as confirmation that every role is remote or available worldwide.
GitHub scores 58/100, indicating a moderately supported remote-work profile based on the available public evidence. The score reflects documented practices, not a guarantee of eligibility or experience for every role or location.
Notion receives a score of 72 out of 100, indicating relatively strong documented remote-work signals with meaningful areas still unverified. The profile reflects public evidence, not a guarantee that every role or location has the same arrangements.
Anthropic scores 72 out of 100, indicating a relatively strong remote-work profile based on the available public evidence. Remote work is not worldwide: current eligibility is concentrated in the AMER and EMEA regions, with roles in six countries. The score is an evidence-based snapshot, not a guarantee that every role has the same terms.
Vercel scores 69, indicating a relatively strong remote-work profile based on the available public evidence. Time-zone flexibility, global hiring footprint, home-office support, compensation transparency, and remote employment labels are supported. The score is not a guarantee that every role or worker has the same arrangement.
Figma scores 65/100, meaning its public evidence shows a moderately strong remote-work profile, with several core practices verified but important areas only partially documented. Confidence is high based on complete coverage of the assessed pillars.
Mozilla scores 85 out of 100, indicating strong public evidence of remote-work practices across the assessed areas. Most pillars are verified; the benefits-parity area is only partially documented.
Coinbase scores 74 out of 100, indicating a strong remote-work profile based on the available public evidence, with some areas only partially documented.
Supabase scores 69/100, indicating a relatively well-documented remote-work profile with strong coverage of eligibility, time-zone flexibility, support, and job labeling. The score is moderated by partial evidence on async maturity and benefits parity, plus no salary ranges in the sampled roles.